The Evidence Behind ACT

Broad Evidence of Effectiveness

ACT is producing consistently positive gains, sometimes quickly, across an unusually broad range of problems.   ACT has been shown to be clinically effective for reducing the following:

  • Depression
  • Anxiety and stress
  • OCD
  • Psychosis
  • Substance abuse
  • Chronic pain
  • Work stress
  • Burnout

And improving the following:

  • Innovation
  • Learning
  • Productivity
  • Resilience
  • Weight maintenance

Further evidence and details of the randomly controlled trials behind this evidence can be found here.

The Processes of Change

In order for an intervention to be truly reliable, we need to understand not just that something works but why it works.

ACT is unusual as the evidence is growing that it actually seems to work through at least some of its theoretically specified processes and components, not just through general processes of change.  What does this mean?

It means that ACT is based on two theoretical approaches with solid evidence to support them.

  1. Relational Frame Theory
  2. Functional Contextual Behaviourism.

These theories predict that increases in psychological flexibility will precede improvements in functioning. The research seems to be supporting this – which makes ACT particularly exciting as an intervention.

3 thoughts on “The Evidence Behind ACT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s